9

4

I was very impressed by the same question at Stackoverflow. So I'm eager to hear about your experience.

What is the worst user interface you've ever had to use (or test)? What made it so terrible? Screenshots are a plus.

flag

16 Answers

6

Hi

Being new(ish) to a mac. I've found UI to support creating a new folder really frustrating.

Essentually i want to be able to right click on the parent folder and click "Create new folder". However, the option doesn't exist!

I know it's a small thing but i forget every time and it always frustrates me.

Mac File infos screen

Matt

link|flag
Huh, I never even noticed that! – Philip Morton Jan 18 at 10:28
Oh, there are a ton of little things on Mac OS that are absolutely infuriating. I really can't understand how anyone but the most basic user can think that's a good operating system compared to Windows and other forms of Linux. – Charles Boyung Jan 18 at 16:38
Really?!? I guess that's a discussion for another topic. :P – Philip Morton Jan 18 at 19:50
Yeah, really - I can't stand Mac OS, and I grew up using Macs in school before I ever had a PC. I actually think things made a heck of a lot more sense back before they completely redesigned everything to make it "easier". Even most beginner computer users I know absolutely hated it when they were convinced to buy a Mac and were elated when I told them that they could install Windows on the stupid things. And to be fair, I use both quite regularly, so I do know what I'm talking about. But Mac OS ONLY gets opened for iPhone development, because I have to do it there. – Charles Boyung Jan 19 at 18:42
There are several little annoyances in Finder like that. Not sure that weighs it down enough to be put in the 'worst UI ever' category, but it'd be nice if they fixed that one of these days. – DA Jul 28 at 13:49
show 3 more comments
4

I see your Finder niggle Matt, and raise you Assyst Enterprise!!. It manages helpdesk calls, and I have to use it to raise change requests. Their website is bad enough...

It is so obscure, hard to use, and manage that I cannot believe people actually use it. There must have been literally no user testing.

(It looks even worse with data — modal dialogs galore, confusing options etc etc etc).

screenshot

link|flag
Excellent - I shall see your UI and raise you a stinker shortly. – Matt Goddard Jan 18 at 10:21
2

Here is another one from the local authority (UK) world: IDOX Uni-form.

I don’t have any screenshots of my own doing, but their planning product brochure (PDF) says enough.

The app uses tabs everywhere, and you use the tabs as the process. So start on the left, and work right. However, you’ll see from their product brief that there are TWO sets of tabs. Yes, that’s right, hierarchical tabs!

What’s worse, I remember working with one of their products that handles automatic generation of “what’s around this property” type searches. For it to work, it required the underlying data to be fundamentally altered.

My contempt for this application was well known. They never let me meet the sales team!!

link|flag
6

This is the laughable webmail interface that our university's Computer Science department forces us to use:

alt text

Most messages can't even be displayed since it's so old that it doesn't support HTML emails, as you can see above.

link|flag
I think that must be the default University e-mail service, because Milwaukee School of Engineering used that 10 years ago and still does, I believe. Also, don't blame the Computer Science department - they aren't the ones making technology decisions for your university. Computer Science is not IT. – Charles Boyung Jan 19 at 18:38
This is our CS email though, not university-wide email. We have two systems and the main university one has Outlook Web Access. So they do have full control over which system they use. – Philip Morton Jan 25 at 10:13
1 
Hmmm... in terms of design, yes it's pretty nasty and not something I'd want to look at every day. However, in terms of usability, I don't think it's really that bad. Not displaying HTML emails might actually be considered a plus! Just wait until you finally do get Outlook - you might regret wishing for it ... – Bobby Jack Jul 29 at 16:16
1

Blog post: The Blackberry Enterprise Server.

It's the worst piece of garbage I have ever used. Made me want to pull my hair out. Pictures on the blog post.

link|flag
2

The admin interface for Drupal. While the CMS itself is very powerful and offers a lot of features, wading through that admin interface to figure out /how/ to set things up is like pulling teeth. Different options are hidden under categories that don't necessarily make sense from a /user/ perspective, though they do from a developer's perspective. The poor categorization of common tasks has led some theme developers to create admin themes that try to get around the problem and those can be enormously helpful, but out of the box, as a CMS admin, just contemplating setting up a Drupal site, having now put together four of them, gives me a massive headache.

link|flag
I totally agree - and trying to explain it to a non-tech editor afterwards makes me sad. – apilati Jul 22 at 17:51
1

I would have to go with the admin interfaces for DotNetNuke. They are absolutely atrocious. Nothing is organized like it should be, and several things that I think should be there just aren't. I love the power that the system provides in building custom sites and allowing for simple plugin development, but the admin UI is absolutely horrible.

link|flag
3

I've actually just thought of an even better choice for worst UI ever - Lotus, the entire suite, but especially Notes. Lotus is an absolutely horrible user experience overall. It seems like they purposely make their apps hard to use because they want to cause pain in their users. I have never met a single person that liked Lotus Notes if they have ever used just about any of their competitors. And as for the other apps in the suite, I'd actually be surprised to hear anyone actually uses those applications anymore.

link|flag
I used to loath Outlook. Then I started using Lotus. Oh how I miss Outlook. – DA Jul 28 at 13:47
@DA - Yep, anyone that hates Outlook probably has never used anything else. I've yet to see a better application than it for what it does. – Charles Boyung Jul 28 at 17:10
1 
I used to loath Notes, then I started using Outlook. Seriously, it might just be that I'm reminiscing through rose-tinted spectacles, but I seem to remember that the calendar in Notes was at least functional. Outlook's calendar function is a joke. Oh, and the fact that it's really difficult to view and/or copy a real email address, as opposed to just the name of the sender. That's just dumb. (BTW, 'good application for what it does' is a pretty high benchmark - how about putty, firefox, textpad? Given that all outlook really has to do is manage email, it does a surprisingly poor job, IMO) – Bobby Jack Jul 29 at 16:34
@Bobby Jack - What do putty, firefox and textpad have to do with Outlook? Absolutely nothing. And what's wrong with Outlook's calendar? I don't have any problem using it. – Charles Boyung Aug 6 at 16:25
1

Lotus Notes.

I would like to say it's something I had to use in the past, but sadly it's something I'm still forced to use today! And we're a fairly progressive IT company!! Although it's becoming less often, which is good.

No two windows/pop-ups/functions are the same. Things that you believe should be easy are simply not possible (i.e. not supported, as opposed to difficult to do). And the password entry field? Seriously...

"Yes sir. You've logged in. Would you like to change your password? No problem, please execute the following 7 incomprehensible and unintuitive commands".

link|flag
1

It's a tie between anything PeopleSoft makes and SharePoint.

link|flag
I haven't really had issues with SharePoint the few times I've used it. What aspects of it don't you like? – Charles Boyung Jul 28 at 17:22
1 
If you've only used it to upload and maintain lists of documents, it's not that bad. For anything else, like trying to use it as a CMS, the user interface gets bloated, repetitive, overly step-by-stepped and often just plain too big for a lot of user's monitors. – DA Jul 28 at 20:21
One thing with the older version of Sharepoint is that it relies heavily on IE functionality. I was not able to use Sharepoint almost at all on my Mac. – Jeroen van den Eijkhof Jul 30 at 7:55
SharePoint is a real behemoth. Admittedly a framework more so than just a product. It almost tries to be too much without making anything straightforward. The navigation is convoluted, even for simple tasks. Plus, customising the UI with your own themes/designs is excessively (almost prohibitively) difficult. – Sam K Jul 30 at 8:55
1

Microsoft Visio makes me want to hurt myself everytime I use it

link|flag
1 
I've never had any problems using Visio, except that with 2007 it's the only "Office" app that doesn't use the ribbon. What exactly do you find issue with? – Charles Boyung Jul 28 at 17:21
I hear you Damian, Visio is painful. – paulseys Jul 30 at 11:17
2

alt text

An advanced search form. Full size at Flickr. If anyone has ever found something through this form … I probably don’t want to be his friend. :)

link|flag
2

The Interface Hall of Shame has many good examples.

link|flag
0

With all my heart I hate Taleo. Looking for a job I stumbled upon this everywhere and it pissed me off so much. There are actual hate-site for Taleo. Now I'm not that extreme, but in the moment of searching and filling out miles of inputs, with duplicates, I get more upset.

link|flag
0

Not the worst, since it is dead simple, but unforgivable for the same reason.

ATM software used by the Bank Of Nova Scotia:

1)Enter PIN # (4 keypresses)

2)Select “Deposit”(1 keypress)

3)Select Account (1 keypress)

4)Enter Amount (probably 6 or 7 keypresses)

5)“Incorrect PIN” go back to Square One. Like they couldn't have told me that immediately after step 1?

If I ever fatfinger my PIN, I can't help thinking "trained monkeys..." 10 or so keystrokes later.

link|flag
0

I take it nobody's used 'vi' in Linux then?

It's a keyboard-controlled text editor for the command line, where there's obviously no mouse available.

This would be fine if it had nice logical keyboard commands like, ctrl-s to save, but no do save you have to type ':w'.

Or how about exiting without saving changes - that'd be ':q!' of course..!

You know that nice 'end' key on your keyboard? Want to use that to go to the end of the line? Tough luck - you'll need to type '$' for that.

To be fair to it, it's about a zillion years old, from way before all your ctrl-s type conventions came around - but I still have to use the bloody thing most days!

link|flag
VI has no UI, so not sure that technically falls into bad UI. But given the target audience for the tool ('nix sysadmins) it seems to fit the bill. – DA Aug 10 at 20:40
On second thought, I stand corrected. There's a UI. Just not a GUI. – DA Aug 11 at 0:53
I believe the :W was 'W'rite (to disk), and :q! was 'q'uit, with '!' meaning 'just do it!'. It made sense at the time, to the person who thought it up, anyway... – mickeyf Aug 23 at 19:27

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.